![]() ![]() Are they scratched, fingerprinted, warped, stuck together, water damaged, mildewed, or damaged by dust? This can be a little more difficult to discern with negatives than with the physical prints, but it will have an impact on your scan quality. In what physical condition are the negatives? Are the negatives available? If so, are they organized so that you know with a reasonable level of certainty what is on them? Index prints or having the negatives with the printed copies of the photos often helps in this regard.Photo scanning does not miraculously fix all of these issues without digital post processing after they are on your computer. Embedded dust, tears, scratches, water damage, fading, and acid or adhesive damage from old photo albums, and other factors likely will affect at least a small portion of the collection at hand. In what physical condition are the original prints? This includes size and state of deterioration.This significant time advantage has to be factored into your decisions when planning a large-scale photo digitization project.ĥ Key Factors Helping to Make the Best Selectionīefore deciding, do a quick inventory of what you have available to scan and ask yourself some important questions: Modern auto-feed photo print scanners, however, scan prints 20 to 40 times faster than either a negative scanner or a traditional flatbed scanner. Flatbeds take about the same amount of time to scan a photo print as a dedicated film scanner does to scan a negative. This is an important distinction over typical flatbed to film scanner comparisons. Instead of focusing on flatbeds, this discussion is going to consider the use of dedicated film scanners, such as the Epson V850 Pro series, along with the current generation of specialized auto-feed photo print scanners, such as the Kodak Picture Saver Scanning System. Today, a flatbed scanner is rarely the best choice for digitizing large numbers of either print or negative scans. Most of the "which is better" assertions still out in forums are founded on the assumption that people are either using flatbed scanners for digitizing both prints and negatives or using a flatbed scanner for the prints and a dedicated film scanner for the negatives. We will start by putting the flatbed on the shelf, focusing instead on specialized negative and photo print scanning equipment. ![]() Both methods have their clear advantages and clear disadvantages. What people need, though, is a simple guide to help them get started looking at their options in a way that will leave them personally satisfied and pleased with the results.Ī lot of articles and forum threads make the subject of print versus negative scanning sound like a winner-take-all death match between two diametrically opposed technologies.įirst, let's dispel that idea. There is no shortage of information on the subject, including in-depth technical analysis on the differences between negative scanning and photo print scanning. 2 GB RAM, free hard disc space: min."Should I scan the photos, or the negatives?"įor those fortunate enough to still have their original negatives, this primary and key decision needs to be addressed. ![]() 10 GB System Requirements (Mac) Mac OS X 10.7 or higher, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz CPU or higher, min. 3 min with 10.000 dpi Color Depth 48 bit Dynamic Range 3.9 PC Interface USB 2.0 Film Types Negative, Positive, B/W as strip (35 mm) or slide (5x5 cm) Power Supply Power adaptor 12 V System Requirements (Windows) Windows XP (SP2), Vista, Windows, 7, 8, 10, 2.0 GHz CPU or hiher, min. Data sheet Image Sensor four-linear CCD Light Source LED (white/infrared) Scan Area max. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |